RT6 WP 6.3 Home |
|
Links to other Research Theme (RT) webpages: RT1 | RT2A | RT2B | RT3 | RT4 | RT5 | RT6 | RT7 | RT8 |
|
RT6 Home | News Archive | Meetings | Reports | Documents and Downloads | Members' Site | Participants | Links to other projects WP6.1 | WP6.2 | WP6.3 | WP6.0 workpages within RT6 with the details of their activity |
Introduction |
This page is for WP 6.3 Impact modelling at seasonal-to-decadal time scales
Leader: UNILIV (Morse). Participants: UREADMM (Wheeler/Slingo),
ARPA-SIM (Marletto), JRC-IPSC (Genovese), METEOSWISS (Liniger/Appenzeller), LSE
(Smith),
FAO (Gommes), WINFORMATICS (Norton), IRI (Thomson), EDF (Dubus), DWD
(Biermann).
Information on the activity within the WP can be found below.
The first section gives the 60 month overview followed by the 18 month objectives and tasks. The section is completed by a list of deliverables and milestones.
Disclaimer: Some of the the information on this page is taken from DoW vn1.4 any errors or inconsistencies with other documentation needs to be discussed with the RT
Background |
The
primary objective of this WP is to integrate application models within a
probabilistic ESM system and within RCM systems. This integration links the
human dimension to earth
system modelling and allows subsequent socio-economic
evaluation of the ENSEMBLES EPS. A number of research and development tasks are
required to allow an effective integration
of the modelling systems. Output
from the integrated EPS/application model runs will be validated in WP5.5
against ERA-40 and where available gridded station data driven application
model runs.
The
current state of the art for quasi-operational impact models running for the
forthcoming season is that they make use of the observed climate through the
first part of the season or
through the preceding season. As an example wheat
yield predictions in Europe are made using a dynamical crop growth model which
is run to a given date using climate observations
and then an end of season
yield prediction is made through a statistical model relating crop development
phase, at that date, to previous known wheat yields. A similar approach can be
made for malaria prediction using the seasonal rainfall totals through the
early part of the rainy season to make a prediction, using a statistical model,
of the forthcoming number of malaria
cases that follow at the end of the rainy
season. In both applications the lead-time is limited and the predictions
become more reliable the later in the season they are produced. Probabilistic
information is routinely used in weather risk management models. However this
is mostly confined to distributions from climatological records, with
occasional input from the mean of seasonal
forecasts. The tropical yield crop
model GLAM has successfully been used to simulate yields over large areas in
India using observed gridded data and reanalysis. Some preliminary work
has
also been undertaken using the DEMETER ensembles for the period 1987-98.
During DEMETER a small number of application models were
developed or modified to use the seasonal probabilistic forecasts to drive,
daily time step, impact model integrations. In
DEMETER the range of impact
models run, the regions covered and number of ensemble members utilised was
limited. Questions that arose during DEMETER regarding downscaling,
bias
correction and how to interpret the probabilistic impact model output were only
partially addressed and these will be more fully investigated within ENSEMBLES.
In ENSEMBLES,
a number of new impact models will run addressing a much larger
potential user community.
ENSEMBLES will attempt to answer a number of novel research questions
i. How to maximise the integrated model system skill using techniques such as ensemble dressing,
ii How to quantification the existing skill within an integrated modelling system,
iii. The estimation of the skill required from the driving seasonal forecasts to allow a skilful seasonal impact forecasts.
Task
6.3.a: Downscaling and bias correction for ensemble hindcasts: This work is
part of RT2B and the research and development will require the seasonal impacts
groups to define their
requirements and work in collaboration with RT2B
partners. The nature of the downscaling requirements will not be uniform for
each application model. The relative improvements of the
various downscaling
schemes will be assessed against un-downscaled ensembles for the impacts
models.
Task
6.3.b: Integration of seasonal-to-decadal application models within an EPS.
Initially the DEMETER datasets will be used to integrate the application
models. As ENSEMBLES
EPS (WP1.5 and WP2A.1) and RCM (WP2B.4 and WP3.5) output
become available they will integrated into the modelling system. Probabilistic
integrated application model runs will
allow the 'skill in hand' of the current
DEMETER EPS to be evaluated within WP5.5. The current skill-in-hand will act as
the baseline from which to compare the developments produced
within ENSEMBLES.
Task
6.3.c: Assessment of GCM vs. RCM driven seasonal-to-decadal application models.
Probabilistic high-resolution regional climate scenarios at seasonal to decadal
timescales from
WP2B.4 and very high resolution RCM-derived scenarios for
non-European areas from WP3.5 will be used to drive the application models and
comparison will be made with GCM driven
application models in the same regions.
The results will be evaluated in WP5.5.
Task
6.3.d: Gaining the maximum skill from an EPS seasonal-to-decadal scale
integration: EPS is a new technology particularly when used for driving
application models. Research and
development will be undertaken to see how a
forecast PDF can be utilised to give the maximum skill in the application
forecasts e.g. ensemble dressing.
Task
6.3.e: Quantification of EPS skill requirements at seasonal-to-decadal
timescales for application models. The integrated application model/ EPS model
system is almost certainly
non-linear for most cases. The defining of skill
requirements from the application forecasts will link to the socio-economic
investigations RT7. The skill definitions from the application
groups will
start to define the level of skill required from the driving
seasonal-to-decadal EPS hindcast. Required skills levels in the hindcast will
differ between different applications but
these required levels would become
the benchmark for targeted forecast skill in current and future EPS.
In
addition to the methodological and theoretical developments outlined in the
tasks above the integration of the impacts models within the ENSEMBLES EPS will
lead to a number of
measurable outputs including as examples
Deliverables and Milestones |
Notes: Deliverable Number 6.0 basic site up and running by month 3 ongoing improvements and expansion through course of ENSEMBLES
Del. No. | Deliverable name | WP no. | Lead participant | Estimated indicative person-months | Nature | Dissemination level | Delivery date |
6.0 | Internal RT6 web site RT6_home page | 6.0 | UNILIV | 3 | O | RE | 3 |
6.1 | Versions of the LPJ and Hadley Centre models which include interactive annual crops. Version of the LPJ model with globally applicable representation of managed forests | 6.1 | PIK | 17 | O | CO | 18 |
6.2 | First-phase impact models to predict damage to human activities, the environment and tropical annual crops from climate extremes: e.g. wind storm, drought, flood and heat stress | 6.1 and 6.2 | UEA | 33 | O | CO | 18 |
6.3 | Calibrated and tested crop, forest, hydrology and energy impact models; baseline data and scenarios for constructing impact response surfaces. | 6.1 and 6.2 | SYKE | 38.5 | O | CO | 18 |
6.4 | Seasonal-to-decadal application models running as part of an integrated probabilistic ESM based on DEMETER hindcasts | 6.3 | UNILIV | 76 | O | CO | 18 |
18 month plan |
Work Package number |
6.3 |
Start date: |
Month 1 |
Activity type |
RTD |
||
Participant id (person-months): |
UNILIV (9), UREADMM (3), ARPA-SIM (24), JRC-IPSC (12), METEOSWISS (4), LSE (3), FAO (4), WINFORMATICS (9), IRI(3), EDF(2), DWD (2.5) |
Objectives Integration of seasonal-to-decadal application modelling within the ENSEMBLES EPS. Commencement of research and development for gaining maximising skill in the integrated modelling system.
|
Description of work WP6.3: Impact modelling at seasonal to decadal timescales Task 6.3.1: Consultation on seasonal-to-decadal applications models requirements for downscaling and RCM integrations with partners in RT2B and WP3.6 Task 6.3.2: The integration of seasonal-to-decadal application models within a probabilistic ESM based on DEMETER hindcasts.
|
Deliverables D6.4: Seasonal-to-decadal application models running as part of an integrated probabilistic ESM based on DEMETER hindcasts Month 18
|
Milestones and expected result M6.5 Integration of seasonal-to-decadal application models within ESM using DEMETER and where available the pilot ENSEMBLES system Month 18
|
Links to Six Monthly Reports |
WP six monthly reports will appear here...
Maintained by Andy Morse and Caminade Cyril Co-ordinators Andy Morse and Colin Prentice Updated |