LIVERPOOL UNDERGRADUATE COMMUNICATION ASSESSMENT
SCALE (LUCAS) – VIDEO A |
INTRODUCTIONS |
||||
|
Competent |
|
Unacceptable |
Comments |
A)
Greeting & Introduction |
|
|
|
No
explanation of why the student is approaching the patient |
B)
Identity Check |
|
|
|
Checks
patient’s full name and date of birth |
GENERAL |
||||
|
Competent |
Borderline |
Unacceptable |
|
C)
Audibility & Clarity of Speech |
|
|
|
Speech is
clear and the patient is likely to hear all key points |
D)
Non-Verbal Behaviour |
|
|
|
Student is
crossing arms, fidgeting to an extent that may limit engagement with the
patient |
E)
Questions, Prompts and/or Explanations |
|
|
|
Very limited
exploration of patient’s concerns; frequent use of jargon |
F)
Empathy & Responsiveness |
|
|
|
Unresponsive
to patient’s concerns/worries; frequently abrupt during consultation; at
times concerns are not acknowledged |
G)
Clarification & Summarising |
|
|
|
No ongoing
clarification; summarising is artificial; very limited/cursory attempt to
elicit further information |
H)
Consulting Style & Organisation |
|
|
|
A random
list of questions; does not follow a logical sequence; overreliance on closed
questions |
PROFESSIONAL
BEHAVIOUR AND CONDUCT |
||||
|
Competent |
|
Unacceptable |
|
I)
Professional Behaviour |
|
|
|
Student
appears disinterested; abrupt tone; distant |
J)
Professional Spoken/Verbal Behaviour |
|
|
|
Student’s
spoken conduct is professional |
|
O |
VG |
C |
BP |
BF |
NYC |
NC |
Please
indicate the student’s overall performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall: ‘Not Yet
Competent (NYC)’. There is a
predominance of negative aspects in this consultation but occasional positive
attributes are evident. |